Every few years the States - now known as "government of Jersey" in some quarters dusts off the "population control" game aka "the obstacles to immigrants" challenge.
There is an urgency to this game now because that other seasonal game - the "10 Years Island Plan" - has also to be designed and sold to the ever gullible public PDQ. Some call it the "Decimation Game".
For those interested in Jersey's post Occupation political history I have scanned a couple of images and post them below.
These are from previous attempts - 1979 and 1995/6 - to devise "population and immigration" policies for Jersey and of course they failed miserably.
What I find especially interesting is that I made submissions in both 1979 and 1995 and I am still wasting my time and energies in trying to influence the decision making process - or even ( I must be deluded) to influence the outcomes.
What is also interesting is to note how few others have stayed the course but a few very significant names are still evident in 2019!
I note that John Young (now President of the Environment aka Planning Department) was in 1996 the COE of that organisation (although it has changed its name and address since then) and John has been knocking Alderney into a different shape too.
Also I note that Mark Boleat chaired the 1995/6 Working Party and he has been Knighted ( I do not know what for) and as Sir Mark Boleat has just been appointed to head up Andium Homes.
It may or may not be relevant that he was one of Charlie's Chums at Westminster.
Who else might have survived the ravages of time I know not but it is the old ideas legacy that concern me mostly.
Of course my political aims and objectives remain remarkably similar to those I gained from my mother's breast ( it was acceptable in those enlightened Socialist days) - whereas I fear that those now entrusted with producing the latest population and immigration policies are also still entrenched in their old discrimination based solutions.
Alas, I include the latest crop of "planners" too because they have a traditional reliance upon creating zones for anything that does not move and a belief that all land must have some sort of "farming" use priority even when there are no farmers to work it or realistic crops to produce. Thus "call it green" is their mantra and there is no more to be said or done....
So to cut a long diatribe short - we are inevitably going to come up with similarly flawed policies and plans - if they can be agreed at all.
If you can try to look at the 1979 and 1996 Reports - they are almost as funny as the Beano Yearbook - so ideal Xmas reading.
Jersey Reform Day. This site is dedicated to the day, now officially recognised annually by the States of Jersey, to mark the anniversary of the events of 28 September 1769. Jersey's own Independence or Bastille Day.
Showing posts with label population control. Show all posts
Showing posts with label population control. Show all posts
Wednesday, December 18, 2019
Friday, May 4, 2018
The Empire Windrush legacy and Jersey population control aspiration in the 2018 General Election
“Hostile
Environment” and “Targets” are words that have brought down the UK Home
Secretary Amber Rudd. She has resigned.
Britain has
suddenly woken up to the reality of the obscene policies that lie behind such
words and has conveniently labelled this as the “Windrush” problem after the
ship that brought in about 600 Jamaican ( and some Polish) immigrants to London
in 1948.
Unfortunately the
penny has not yet dropped in Jersey (or Guernsey) where the policy of creating
a “Hostile Environment” for “immigrants” has been accepted for decades and is
being enforced now with greater enthusiasm than ever.
During the current
Jersey General Election there is hardly a candidate who does not propose the
application of even harsher “immigration controls”.
Coupled to this is
the demand for “targets” of the number allowed in each year and for a maximum
population “target” to be achieved.
Making life
unbearable so that “immigrants” leave the territory should be so obviously unacceptable
to any decent person but where election votes are concerned such values can be
trampled on with impunity.
Of course in the UK
the pretence that it is “illegal immigrants” that are the “target” has now been
exposed as wholly false because the use and mis-use of deportation powers and other
punishments have been widely inflicted on almost anybody whose face did not fit
the “British” profile.
In part of course,
this prejudiced application of arbitrary controls has been fuelled by the
campaigning of such groups as UKIP and the BREXIT referendum and its continuing
aftermath.
In the UK,
landlords, employers, the NHS, Charities, banks and many more have been sucked
into the “policing” role of demanding ID cards and police checks to help create
an underclass of “foreign”, mainly ethnic origin workers and their families,
vulnerable to exploitation with limited access to the social and welfare safety
nets.
Those persons in
abusive relationships with partners, employers or landlords are often so
intimidated that they do not seek help from the Police or other agencies.
UK Immigration laws
do apply in the Channel Islands but how they are actually administered is
vague.
Deportations from
the Islands are usually made known only when a person enters the territory
illegally and is arrested at the Ports – usually from St Malo.
However, the next
stage of UK controls that demand English language tests, for example, will be
in force here and will be added to the disgracefully discriminatory housing and
work restrictions that are already in force in the Islands. Those “immigrant”
persons who fail the language test – we are told - may be deported from the UK
and presumably the Channel Islands too.
Furthermore,
Senator Routier’s extraordinary Jersey “population control” measures based upon
10 months or 4 years work permits will be added to the controlling mix. These
will apply to ALL so called immigrants into Jersey whether they are British
from the UK or “foreign” from EU or any other “non EU” but “foreign” place
around the globe.
The status of
persons from the BOTs (British Overseas Territories) arriving in the CIs for
work or play is not clear.
How the UK
government will be induced to approve of such legislation which adds to the
existing 5 years (work) and 10 years (housing) qualifications is anybody’s guess.
The Guernsey
government already has had to relax recently introduced and restrictive
regulations based upon short-term “work permits” because they caused so many
workers to leave the Island. Some of these workers – rather like “Windrush”
immigrants - were long term residents of Guernsey.
It was the loss of
workers and complaints from business that stimulated the panic changes.
Not any sudden
discovery of a lost morality.
But evidently, The
Channel Islands have been operating policies specifically designed to create a
“hostile environment” for decades and the deliberate intention has been to make
life so difficult that many (so called) immigrants leave after a few years.
In other words they
do not become established in order to claim the benefits of the Social Security
and Income Tax or other impositions that they have paid and gain no status in
the job market or to obtain proper housing accommodation.
They are second
class residents by design.
The Jersey system
already requires that all new arrival must obtain a “registration card” for a
fee from the Social Security Department and this must be shown before taking employment.
Jobs for new
arrivals (except special “key workers”) are generally restricted to those
officially described as “low skilled” and not in demand by “locals” – such as
catering, cleaning, tourism or agriculture.
After 5 years in
such employment a person can enter the general employment market and claim
Social Security benefits but there is no unemployment benefit payable in Jersey.
New arrivals are
also restricted to lodgings type accommodation for 10 years continuous
residence. All resident are supposed to notify changes of employer or home address
to the Social Security Department and registration cards must be shown to
employers and landlords.
Under the new
Routier plan, “immigrant” workers will be required either to leave after about
10 months (seasonal workers) whilst longer term employed must leave after 4
years.
Thus neither
category will progress to the 5 year (work and benefits) or 10 years (housing)
qualifications sector.
The poor standards
of housing accommodation currently available to the 13,000 resident “non quals”
workers and their children have not gone entirely unnoticed.
The recent death of
a farm worker in his accommodation has highlighted the dilemma and the Independent
Jersey Care Inquiry Report (into child abuse since 1945) drew particular
attention to the social problems created by such discriminatory policies.
It has featured in
several past election campaigns and politicians have promised to deal with the
problem and the allied lack of security, low pay and substandard working
conditions.
So far there is
little actual improvement to be seen although some legislation is now in place
regarding the standards of properties to let.
Yet, the “hostile environment” is not
a critical feature of the current Jersey election but rather - as already
referred to - there is almost a competition among many candidates to put forward the most repressive
policies that purport to limit population growth and preserve jobs and housing accommodation for
“locals.”
What might happen
as a result of BREXIT is also uncertain.
Whether there will
be “free movement” across European borders is still being discussed in London but
where those borders might be, whether visas will be required and if the “Common
Travel Area” might survive are all uncertain.
What future relationships
might exist for the Crown Dependencies with the UK, the EU and the rest of the
world is not determined.
The status quo will
not prevail.
So far it has been
suggested that all those “EU” nationals resident in the UK and the Islands must
apply for “settled status” and will thus have a “right to remain” but how this
will relate to their dependents in other places, future children, marriages
across nationalities or gender or changed circumstances and many other factors,
is not at all clear.
Because of the
difficulties already found in recruiting workers, the Islands are suggesting
that (having virtually exhausted the supply from the UK and the EU) recruits
might be found from such as Kenya or the Ukraine who are willing to accept the
low pay and poor working conditions instead.
This seems very
unlikely – even if the new post BREXIT arrangements with the UK and the EU
allow it.
There are about 2
million Filipinos in the Middle East. Many are exploited and abused.
The Philippines
government has responded to the death of 7 workers in Kuwait by banning
nationals from taking up “low skilled” jobs in that country. The ban may be
extended to other countries even though there is a great shortage of employment
in the Philippines.
The artificial
creation of a “hostile environment” for so called immigrants in Jersey is
totally unacceptable and any population control policies based upon “targets”
needs to be examined very carefully with Human Rights standards, rather than
profit from growth, being uppermost in the minds of those who promote them.
The "Empire Windrush" made just one voyage in 1948 carrying Jamaicans and some Polish refugees to London.
She caught fire and sank in 1954. Four crew members died.
We should burn the "Hostile Environment" policy for Jersey in her memory.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


